翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Four (One Direction album)
・ Four (TV series)
・ Four Abstract Classicists
・ Four Aces
・ Four Aces (passenger liners)
・ Four Aces (Wild Cards)
・ Four Acres (Charlottesville, Virginia)
・ Four Acres, California
・ Four Adventures of Reinette and Mirabelle
・ Four Advisors
・ Four Altos
・ Four Ambient Tales
・ Four Ancient Books of Wales
・ Four and Twenty Blackbirds
・ Four Anniversaries for the Piano
Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television
・ Four Arrows
・ Four arts
・ Four Ashes
・ Four Ashes railway station
・ Four Ashes, Buckinghamshire
・ Four Ashes, Staffordshire
・ Four Asian Tigers
・ Four Assassins
・ Four Bacharach & David Songs
・ Four Bagatelles
・ Four Bandits
・ Four Barrel Coffee
・ Four Bears Bridge
・ Four Bears Village, North Dakota


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television : ウィキペディア英語版
Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television

''Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television'' (1978) is a book by Jerry Mander, who argues that many of the problems with television are inherent in the medium and technology itself, and thus cannot be reformed.
Mander spent 15 years in the advertising business, including five as president and partner of Freeman, Mander & Gossage, San Francisco, a nationally-known advertising agency.
==Author's summary==

In an interview with Nancho.net's W. David Kubiak, Mander summarizes his book:

Well, one of the points of the book is that you really can't summarize complex information. And that television is a medium of summary or reductionism - it reduces everything to slogans. And that's one criticism of it, that it requires everything to be packaged and reduced and announced in a slogan-type form.
But let me say this: the book is not really four arguments, it's really hundreds of arguments broken down into four categories. And the categories have to do with a variety of effects that are not normally discussed. Most criticisms of television have to do with the television program content. People say if there is less violence on television or less sexism on television, or less this or less that, television would be better. If there were more programs about this or more programs about that, then we'd have "good television".
My own feeling is that that is true - that it's very important to improve the program content - but that television has effects, very important effects, aside from the content, and they may be more important. They organize society in a certain way. They give power to a very small number of people to speak into the brains of everyone else in the system night after night after night with images that make people turn out in a certain kind of way. It affects the psychology of people who watch. It increases the passivity of people who watch. It changes family relationships. It changes understandings of nature. It flattens perception so that information, which you need a fair amount of complexity to understand it as you would get from reading, this information is flattened down to a very reduced form on television. And the medium has inherent qualities which cause it to be that way.
And the book is really about television considered from a holistic point of view, from a biological point of view - perceptual, environmental, political, social, experiential, as well as the concrete problems of whether a program is silly or not. But other people deal with that very well. My job was to talk about television from many of these other dimensions which are not usually discussed.


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.